Bay Pelican
Moderator Emeritus
Interesting translation.
Are you suggesting that 47% don't pay Federal Taxes means that 47% are getting a check?
Last number I saw was 113 million were getting some form or assistance which is only 35% not 50%.
Interesting translation.
Are you suggesting that 47% don't pay Federal Taxes means that 47% are getting a check?
"They do nothing to alleviate the issues we have regarding the disparity of the very rich, the rich, and the well off, from the poor and struggling in our country."
Your proposed solution?
there is a significant percentage of the bottom 50% who owe their situation to their own bad choices and the government promoting welfare as a way of life.
Freeze tax levels, balance the budget. Like State law, make it a law that the budget has to balance. Then only allow deficit spending in times of a declared war, or natural disaster.
Implement a national service. All kids, male and female, at age 18.Two years in Service. That does not mean armed service only, but across multiple disciplines, giving them a set of skills that are usable in the work force. Offer them entry into the following if they chose.
Technical colleges, stop converting them to four year colleges. Focus them on two year "vocation" courses. Carpentry, electrics, farming, plumbing, construction, etc. with an apprentice program following. It is shocking that in many cases you need a 4.0+ to get into a STATE college, the fall back is currently a two year school which is quickly disappearing.
Look at why state college cost are spiraling out of control, to the extent that many less-well-off families simply cannot afford it. Yes I've seen the arguments about paying your way through school, but it's damn hard to get a job and pay for tuition while you look over your shoulder and see that your extended family are struggling to put food on the table and cover healthcare etc.
Health care. We need to resolve the cost of health care. Everyone points to pharmaceutical prices, the manufacturers. More could be done there, but a stern look at hospital costs, especially specialist and administration costs, needs to happen. Health care can simply not be left to the free market. Burying our heads on the issue due to political stance is not resolving the issue - and it remains a huge issue.
There are a few ideas IMO, but of course politicians feed of division of the electorate, so small chance of any of this happening, especially since they sit in the top part of the divide.
Ok, since you asked.What percentage is that? How specifically does government promote poverty as a way of life?
And how much has government spent bailing out, subsidizing, and given tax deductions for banks, corporations and farmers (now usually one and the same) who have made bad decisions?
Greetings,
Mr. OC. Not trying to start an argument but drug addiction (street and prescription drugs, alcohol and tobacco) is a social ill suffered by people at ALL financial levels and treatment should be addressed by an all encompassing medical system. Those people using are simply trying to find escape from their predicament.
Misuse of welfare is indeed a problem BUT not all that need assistance abuse the system. Perhaps better policing or a readjusted means test?
Forced sterilization (birth control) won't sit well with a "certain" segment of the greater population.
Perhaps a guaranteed income, if working, with no loss of benefits as judged by above mentioned means test.
Education at all levels is the solution.
Greetings,
Mr. BB. Isn't that basically what I posted? Lack of education at ALL levels IS the problem.
Mr. RT, I need to clarify a few things.Greetings,
Mr. OC. Not trying to start an argument but drug addiction (street and prescription drugs, alcohol and tobacco) is a social ill suffered by people at ALL financial levels and treatment should be addressed by an all encompassing medical system. Those people using are simply trying to find escape from their predicament.
Misuse of welfare is indeed a problem BUT not all that need assistance abuse the system. Perhaps better policing or a readjusted means test?
Forced sterilization (birth control) won't sit well with a "certain" segment of the greater population.
Perhaps a guaranteed income, if working, with no loss of benefits as judged by above mentioned means test.
Education at all levels is the solution.
I was suggesting the government offer a substantial amount of money to a woman willing to give up her future reproductive option. I would think an offer of $20K might be of interest to a woman living in poverty.
Ted
We have one of the highest levels of inequality. We truly have the 1% and the 50%.
To be fair, yes. That's because I believe the world is overpopulated by humans.Ted, let me ask you a question.
Would you consider making the same offer to a woman who was either rich or well off?
Not implying that social ills are only associated with the poor, but everyone has a choice. There are those who have escaped poverty through a frugal lifestyle and spending money on vocational training to get a better job, but they rarely make news.
Do a budget for a single mom making $10 an hour.
Greetings,
Mr. P. Could you be more specific please. Mr. OC has presented opinions on several issues the majority of which I agree with but he is just a bit "off base", IMO, on some.
It’s probably more productive to help this mom (and dad) improve their decision making skills. Creating a child is a tremendous responsibility, and one a parent should be prepared for.
You’re not qualified to be a parent if your income stream is $10/hr x Y hours.
This is a US centric discussion,and USA has, to Australia,a different wage structure. We have wage fixing systems and tribunals,and a history of Union involvement in wage "negotiation". The minimum wage here is way more than $10 an hour,around double that,though our $ is less valued to yours....Nearly 40% of all hourly workers have been making less than $10.10 per hour. Now, hopefully, with the changes happening with some large employers that number will decrease.