Most of your electronics are find at lower voltages, but that doesn't mean it's great for them, especially if smaller wires. (lower voltage = more amps/heat for same power/watts).
You can look at low voltage cutoff on your equipment. Most will be 10-10.5VDC. Above that should be ok.
The only FF voltage/SOC chart I've ever seen was from 2016. It claims these values at C/10 discharge rate.
13.35 100%
12.78 90%
12.64 80%
12.50 70%
12.34 60%
12.19 50%
12.02 40%
11.84 30%
11.63 20%
11.49 15%
11.33 10%
11.10 5%
10.50 0%
Personally I find these a little (0.1+V) optimistic even when new. We have six L15% FF Oasis 4v batteries in 3S2P arrangement. Soon to be replaced with LiFePO4 partly due to voltage sag. The wife likes to use start very large electric loads first thing in the morning and the load(s) would pull voltage down to 11.5 ish triggering my low voltage alarm setting.
Something else mentioned in this thread is using DC-DC to keep voltage steady. Keep in mind that those waste 11-12% during the process according to specs. I've never measured the actual waste. It could be higher.
Voltage can be an excellent measure of the SOC. It is best coupled with an AH counter. We currently use a BMV-712. As demonstrated in this thread, when the SOC meter reads 50% but the voltage (under similar load) is lower than it used to be, that is the SOC meter reading incorrectly, not the voltage meter.
Chris
SV Cosmos
Thanks Chris,
There is a lot to unpack here.
The housebank voltages do not reflect SOC in any reliable way so I agree that that these voltage / SOC charts are idealized and not reflective of a real housebank that has been in use and may have been degraded or the SOC under load.
The Firefly Carbon Foam (FF) batteries do behave differently from AGM’s.
I made the mistake of setting the charging protocol to have a float charge for the first 5 years of owning our FF’s. . After a few weeks on shore power and first using the house bank we would see a very rapid sag in voltage down to ~ 12.4-12.5 VDC with only 50-ish Ah draw. The voltage would then more slowly decline towards 12.1 VDC as we drew down further. After a re-charge cycle, or two we would start to see a more robust maintenance of voltage with less of an initial sag.
Reviewing the updated FF manual (2020), they suggest avoiding a float charge and using a CC/CV charge protocol with no float. They also describe a conditioning protocol where the batteries are drawn down to 10.5V & recharged as aggressively as possible. I’ve done a variation of this recently (drawn down to ~23% SOC @ 11.3 VDC) and am now seeing much better maintenance of voltage for any given SOC.
So, it looks like my FF bank needed a different charging protocol and at least one conditioning cycle. I think it is functioning much better now with higher voltages for any given SOC. It also appears to be accepting higher currents on the recharge cycle.
Time will tell.
Nevertheless, it’s also good to know that it’s reasonably safe to touch on 12.0 or 11.9V without damaging the instruments.
I do know that the Furuno chartplotter is very sensitive to lower voltages and I wonder whether the NMEA 2000 instruments don’t act up (eg failure of all 3 GPS units to get a fix etc.) when they’ve been subject to lower voltages. So to try to eliminate this risk, I’ve just installed a Victron DC-DC 12-12 18A converter to supply these instruments with steady 13.3 VDC power. It’s too early to say how effective this will be but I’m not provoking a reboot of the MFD anymore when starting the engine. (The addition of the DC-DC unit does not seem to have changed the current draw very much.)
Fingers crossed.
I may be able to hold off on a LiPO4 upgrade for a few more years.
-evan