Hippocampus
Guru
- Joined
- Jul 27, 2020
- Messages
- 4,180
- Location
- Plymouth
- Vessel Name
- Hippocampus
- Vessel Make
- Nordic Tug 42
Z your statement is just illogical . You pick one version of one type of test. You are right that a version of antibody testing had high false positive and high false negatives. It was thrown out and is no longer in use. Even when in use accounted for a extremely small number of tests. In fact multiple versions of various types of tests have been thrown out. Thinking about all testing incorrect results may have produced less than 5% variance overall. I’ve discussed the types of tests in an earlier post. Please read it. Please understand at this point for the purposes of epidemiological study the false negative/positive rate of testing is included in the analysis. Please understand as PCR testing has become more widely available and other forms of testing improved your statement doesn’t hold water.
I don’t know what you mean by “scans”. Never heard that term in relationship to this issue. I don’t know the specifics of B.C. The statement that “any corona type virus” confuses me as this is a novel virus and all the testing I know about tests for constituents only seen on that virus. Please supply sources for your statements.
I don’t know what you mean by “scans”. Never heard that term in relationship to this issue. I don’t know the specifics of B.C. The statement that “any corona type virus” confuses me as this is a novel virus and all the testing I know about tests for constituents only seen on that virus. Please supply sources for your statements.
Last edited: