How can that be corrected?Taking the fuel from the port tank and returning the unused fuel to the port tank. Which is what you want to do - return the fuel to the tank it is being drawn from.
What is missing is the ability to draw from both and return to both and the ability to transfer between both. Not necessities, just nice to have if balancing the boat.
That's what threw me. Thought they were both off when actually they are both on to the port. Supply and return both going to port. I think we've figured it out.Are they not both pictured in the OFF position?
-Chris
That's what threw me. Thought they were both off when actually they are both on to the port. Supply and return both going to port. I think we've figured it out.
Folks, both are on. The large side of the switch is the handle - there is a little arrow point on the other side showing what is on.
Thumbs up!!! I think you nailed it!We are all making guesses, so I will as well.
I think what happened was that when the valves were initially installed over that piece of wood or starboard, the positions for the Port and Starboard tank were written on the board. They were correct. With that type of valve handle, the direction of the pointer indicates which way it is open, not the direction of the long handle.
At some point, the PO was confused and made a guess based on his ignorance of how those valves work. In the photo you provided the fuel is drawn from the Port tank and returned to the Port tank. It appears that your setup will allow you to draw from one tank or the other and feed to one tank or the other. Normally you will draw and return to the same tank. However as Menzies mentioned, there are times when you may want to draw from one and return to the other if you need to rebalance fuel more quickly. However, this is dangerous if you happen to forget. You can end up with an expensive fuel spill.
In short, I can see where you could have been confused if you have not seen that type of valve handle before. You also assumed that the markings were correct. In this case, the initial markings were but the later On/Off markings were written by an uniformed and unfortunate PO.
It looks like originally the valves were either selecting Port or Starboard. Then someone wrote on and off with a marker. That is what is confusing to me. The valves are probably on all of the time, just either on to port or on to starboard. I don't see how they could be off in any position unless one of the tanks are disconnected.
How can that be corrected?
Reading all this; I'm reminded of the John Denver fuel valve fatality.
Having seen his actual aircraft after the accident and studying it at Monterrey Naval Post Graduate Safety training, what exactly is the point concerning his error as I know the probable answer?
Only because the only ones I have seen are 180 degree sweeps...
Are there 3-way valves that function within a 90 degree throw?
yep, sad. Never flown a rutan design, but these are "stall resistant". Was there research on why an engine out would head it at high descent speed? Back when I had to worry with this, all the fuel valves were in front of me and well marked;